Both the reading and the lecture are about the discovery of an old nest inside a 200-million- years-old fossilized tree. The author claims that this cannot be evidence that bees had existed 200 million years ago, and he provides three reasons. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects all of these ideas. She thinks none of these claims can disapprove of the existence of bees 200 million years ago.
First of all, the writer of the article claims that there is no fossil of bees which dates 200 million years. He mentions that the oldest fossil ever dates 100 million years, not more. The professor, however, challenges this idea. She states that the lack of bees' fossils isn't convincing proof for the absence of bees. Moreover, she says there might not be a suitable tree to produce proper resign to create and hold the fossils of bees.
Secondly, the essay implies that bees and flowering plants are in a close relationship, and since in those times, there were no signs of flowering plants, the presence of bees is impossible. The lecturer rebuts this concept. She points out that flowering plants might have evolved after bees, and during this time, bees had been feeding on some non-flowering plants.
Finally, the writer of the essay is of the opinion that these nest structures don't have a modern structure of bees' nest. He mentions that these ancient nest lack caps, which implies they are other insects’ nests. In contrast, the lecturer states that there is proof that this fossil is related to bees. She mentions that the same water-proof material, which is used by modern bees, has been found in this fossil, which shows this archaic nest is related to bees, not other species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...he states that the lack of bees fossils isnt convincing proof for the absence of bee...
^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the opinion that these nest structures dont have a modern structure of bees nest. H...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83848797251 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33941633027 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512027491409 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3940194201 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334052633553 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1088344861 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101593491033 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197990714014 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122374930422 0.0443174109184 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.