Both article and lecture are bout solutions to prevent birds from hitting to the windows which might kill them. The author provides three solutions and discusses them. On the other hand, lecturer rebuts these ideas. He believes none of these solutions effectively helps birds.
First, The writer of the essay states that using one-way glasses, which people can see through them in just one side, can be useful. Professor, however, disagrees with this idea, because in these glasses the other side of the glass is like a mirror and reflects the surrounding environments such as sky and trees and, birds are not able to perceive this matter.
Second, the author suggests using colorful-lines on the glasses to make birds understand the existence of windows. Lecture challenges this concept by mentioning that birds, in this case, try to pass through the lines and this cause them to hit the glass. Moreover, He points out that for avoiding this problem these lines should be increased, which makes the inner space of the room dark.
Third, the essay says that since birds use magnetic fields to navigate, equipping buildings with powerful magnetic keeps birds away. Lecturer rejects this idea. He mentions that although birds use magnetic fields for navigational purposes, they employ it just in long travells. He states that in short distances, birds almost use their eye and light, so being a powerful magnetic field around houses doesn't help at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...a powerful magnetic field around houses doesnt help at all.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, second, so, third, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08368200837 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38823819127 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63179916318 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8822750785 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4615384615 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186780264178 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575225721478 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499680444568 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101304798303 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493116212104 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.