It has been always a controversial debate that government how to allocate their budget for different purpose. Some people think that the improvement of the internet access is more necessary than public transportation, however, in my opinion, because of the increase in the population around the world governments should spend more money on public transportation improvement. I feel this way for some reasons that I will explore in the following essay:
First of all, as all we know, today we are faced with many environmental issues such as air pollution. With the improvement of public transportation, people would be encouraged more to use them instead of their cars for going to their workplace and other places around the city. For example, imagine a metropolitan city, if there would be many buses or subway stations around the city in many areas, people would rather to use them for their transportation. Consequently, the usage of fossil fuels would be declined and as a result the amount of released CO2 into the atmosphere would be dramatically decreased. Hence, in my opinion it is more beneficial if governments spend more money to build more subway routs or bus stations and equipped the available systems with faster and modern buses or trains.
Moreover, the improvement of the public transportation can result in reduction of traffic. Nowadays, many people waste time by getting stuck in traffic. However, if people have easy access to fast and convenient transportation system they could save more time. Therefore, as they have more time their output would be increased a lot and also their satisfaction from their life would be raised too. my personal experiment is a compelling evidence of this: till last year there was not any subway near my house and I had to go to my workplace every day with my car and because of the high traffic I had to wake up early mornings. But after the building and development of the subway routs, now I can use it and further than reduction in traffic in our region, it is not necessary for me to wake up early in the mornings and I don’t feel tired during my working hours. In addition I arrive home earlier than before and I have more free time to do my stuffs.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that, its better to allocate more budget for developing the transportation system because further than helping to the environmental issues, which are very significant nowadays, it would result in reduction of traffic in cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...on from their life would be raised too. my personal experiment is a compelling evi...
^^
Line 4, column 870, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... feel tired during my working hours. In addition I arrive home earlier than before and I...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89336492891 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89951448524 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504739336493 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1666578716 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.666666667 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1333333333 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.45110844103 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219751269597 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811221318593 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707373043356 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149244837279 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077720628754 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.