Due to progress of technology and science, in all community people fan of something, like as football matches, and the huge one is fan of football player Captain Christian Rolando. Actually the government supported the hobby that most of the people enjoy it. Although the art has its own place, we even have seen, athletic and consequence people buy expensive portrait. In my opinion, government’s should pay attention to Olympics champion.
First, Olympic has identity program that most of the people in the world follow their identical team very proudly. And If they were an athletic person to now on, they have especially connection between this program and their sport field. As I remember, I saw the Olympic 2009 in television, and I asked from my parents to buy triple cable to watch all programs live until midnight. I enjoyed that Olympic because, I was a horse rider and in the final practice my horse got injured, and his wrist got broken and I omitted from the race match and I couldn’t achieve my dream Olympic champion, so when I saw them on television I feel good, to improve my problems and Technics.
Second, some people interested on arts, but they studied art in university and they know all sides of it, but most of the people just enjoy it, like as listen to music or purchased some paintings of famous portraits, in practical sides they don’t understand it anymore, but watching Olympics is exciting to get win your team in the world while face on to sturdy professional teams that make full of proud and spite them to watch it everywhere online or in television the matter is their identically teams win. Also, some people spend money to watch it in stadium and in my experienced that I had in 2017 was the most interesting by far watching on screen at home. Because the area encourages you to shout and stand to motivate your team that from your country. In addition, you are full of energy and if your team couldn’t win you’ll feel disappointment and get angry.
In conclusion, the government should pay attention to both of them, but the vote win the majority of people likes, therefore, they spend their investment to that part, to show they are respect to their people. I hope my examples have sufficiently expressed my opinion.
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO 37 Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for this money Use specific reasons and examples t 73
- TPO-07 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 56
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81725888325 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75442810374 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535532994924 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.465483613 48.9658058833 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.571428571 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113202617882 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472715196228 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337324600723 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700583438859 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223401949369 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.