Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans

In an era of progress to grower of technology, most of the people busy with their job and almost, they do all their work and relationships on their cell phones. Although animals are their sympathetic friends they have. Mammals are the most intelligent than other animals, like as dogs or cats. They learn lots of things from living in humanity life. In my opinion, animals are a major part of our life.

First, pets are a great motivation to wake up every morning and keep working to make more money for them to feed them and buy everything they need. For example, I should work hard, because half of my life is my animals. I have 43 hectares of land, including the citrus garden, the grapes garden, the sun flower garden and the lavender garden. Also, I have my own sheep business with 5 Australian shepherd dogs and 10 hens and 3 horses. Therefore, I should take care of them. When one of them get sick, I’m get nervous and call my veterinary to send a veterinarian to my farm. Last year one of my horse’s bleeds during childbirth and sleeps down the floor. The best way to get rid of that situation was, Euthanasia'' because of a horse that could not be lifted, so we should have made it a great deal, that is mean, a calm death.

Second, dogs are the best friends of children, they grow up together and they have different personality like as humans, some of them are helping children with disabilities and some of them, are helping elderly people also, some of them, Identify specific diseases. For example, in 2015, in Turkish, a one-year-old Golden retriever lived with a family of three. His name is Roxel. One day he had licked stomach of the mother of the family without any reason on a special point, and she said that, she was read the newspaper with that topic’’ dogs are brilliant in identify diseases’’ so, she went to visit her doctor and after some examination and sampling doctor told them you have cancer, but don’t worry, you are in the first step of your sickness and the marvelous point is, none of the people can understand or have doubt to have cancer so how your dog did it?!

In conclusion, animals are useful in humanity life’s. As much as they need us, we need them as well. Living with these creatures made humans more comfortable with each other.

Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and relationships on their cell phones. Although animals are their sympathetic friends t...
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...umans more comfortable with each other.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63196125908 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63671160043 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581113801453 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 120.553501875 48.9658058833 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 100.684210526 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7368421053 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175219733727 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485135049724 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687038869583 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119372684715 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918495941597 0.0645574589148 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.