TPO19(independent)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.

I disagree with the statement and I think in order to be well-informed, people do not have to obtain information from different sources. I explain my opinion in following reasons:

First, getting information require time for everyone and trying to extract information from several sources surely results time shortage for people. It means people neglect many information to review all sources which have been planned to use. For example a person who try to collect information in specific marketing subject from all sources include different books, internet, papers and academy in misses some information from valuable books because he or she spends time to use websites information.

Second, credibility of information is an important issue in modern life. In fact sources are in contradiction with each other in many times and it is necessary to know right sources in every field and use their information. For example there are many different sources to get news and they inform people differently in a particular subject. This happens because of their bias or goals or political views. We know BBC informs people in a different way in comparison with CNN.

Third, there is an old statement that says instead of reading several books you should read a book several times. It is like a deep sea or shallow sea. When people use many sources for information they do not pay attention to information's quality and just consider about quantity of sources instead of that. For example a pricing expert can use many sources to set a product's price but he or she needs to use a strong source to reach optimum price. In fact skills require training over and over again and it could not possible with using different sources and people should be expert in a specific method.

In conclusion maybe different sources can help people to be just informed but for being well-informed potent and credible sources is the key point.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...age for people. It means people neglect many information to review all sources which...
^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...age for people. It means people neglect many information to review all sources which have been p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...heir information. For example there are many different sources to get news and they inform peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tical views. We know BBC informs people in a different way in comparison with CNN. Third, ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, third, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0062305296 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71111098383 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4324249771 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.133333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267277778259 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101473485587 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101465837873 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190564829055 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10201876826 0.0645574589148 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.