TPO29 -To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether universities should enhance the professors' salarie to improve the quality of the education has received a great deal of attention from people and society. Although some may argue that raising the salaty of the professors might decrease their works quality, I as well as many others believe that spending more money on the professors' salaries are beneficial for either students or professors. I am of the opinion that both of these viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, a paramount reason why universities should spend more money for their professors is that the professors play a crucial rule in education of the students; then, they should have enough intence to training the youth. It is axiomatic that people who receive a plenty of money that they deserve, they would be more energetic to improve their abalities since they understand that they value of their time has been percieved. For instance, I has a professor who was my supervisor in college. Due to not receiving enough money, he did not interest to spend his time to do his works. He usually did not help the students through their thesis and did not consume energy to solve the students problem.
A further reason for this view is that in thi competitive world, people always worried about their life and their costs. It is sometimes said that professors who do not get enough money, they would spend most of their time to other jobs due to receive more money to have a better life. As a result, they might not focus on their work due to the reason that they virtually involve in finding a second job which could be more beneficial for them. Take a professors who have company as an exmaple, they have to establish a company to get more money; However, they could not spend enough time on their college works and might be distracted by their secondory works.
On the other hand, it is occasionally said that people who are prosperous in their life, they might lose their intence to being more successful. This means that they might spend their time on spending their money on entertainment more than focusing on their works. Some experts claim that people should earn money by their qualifications; therefore, they might be some professors in the colleges who are not good enough to get more money.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I can draw the concolusion that raising the professors' salaries is beneficial for students due to the reason that it is not only persusade professors to spend more time and energy but also can improve their work quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ime has been percieved. For instance, I has a professor who was my supervisor in co...
^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...and did not consume energy to solve the students problem. A further reason for this ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a professor' or simply 'professors'?
Suggestion: a professor; professors
...could be more beneficial for them. Take a professors who have company as an exmaple, they ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in brief, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89130434783 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6292451496 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439130434783 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1921925182 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.625 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286608584291 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116008376186 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896542879107 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199347424729 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642387104619 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.