The lecture and the passage discuss the application of a mystrey book which has been written in a unknown script. Although the passage claims that there are three theories for the origin of this book, the speaker refutes these theories through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First of all, the passage points out that this book could be a original work containing several scientific or magical topics, as the Antony Ascham did in sixteenth-century. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this idea by claiming that Ascham was a ordinary physician who had some typical ideas. As a result, he could not write a high-level scientific book due to the reason that his knowledge was in a low-level to have a breakthrough idea.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states tha this book could be written by Edward Kelly who was notorious to write some meaningful book to appealing people and receive some money, the professor argues that it was quiet easy to fool people on those time due to the fact that they were not well-informed. He also believes that Kelly could write a simpler book to foolish people since this complex manuscript was not essential.
Finally, although the passage says that this manuscript might be written by the Voynich himself to decive people to buy it as a antique book, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that this manuscript has been written by a ink which its age have been estimated more than 400 years old. Therefore, the Voynich could not fake a ink with this age.
Through the reasons which have been described above, the passage claims are rejected by the professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... mystrey book which has been written in a unknown script. Although the passage cl...
^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sage points out that this book could be a original work containing several scient...
^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s this idea by claiming that Ascham was a ordinary physician who had some typical...
^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...h himself to decive people to buy it as a antique book, the speaker disagrees by ...
^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hat this manuscript has been written by a ink which its age have been estimated m...
^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... Therefore, the Voynich could not fake a ink with this age. Through the reas...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90974729242 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63160800368 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3292108017 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13200523353 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058312053019 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040565783368 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717452811026 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485023201924 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.