Do you agree or disagree? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether people can be well-informed by havnig different news sources has rceived a great deal of attention from people an socialogists. Although some may argue that many of resources can be misleading for people, I as well as many others believe that having differntiate information sources can be beneficial to have a reasonable judgement and legemetite critism. I am of the opinion that both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, without the shadow of doubt, people always judge the current affairs in the world within their own perspectives. In this technological decades, people has been exposed by a large number of information which is ardous to decide the accuracy of them. It is aximatic that for having a wide sight about different affairs and getting a legitimate desicion, one should see the issues through different sides. getting information from distintic sources, people can percieve the issues through different aspects and be well-informed in a specific issue. As a case of point, If people decide to participate in a electral affair they should read or listen to all of the candidate news resources and by doing this work they can choose their candidate without any wrong information.
Furthermore, it has been establish beyond the doubt that criticize of the information and their accuracy should be examined by the people. It is occasionally said that people all around the world, usually, are recieved inaccurate information within the social medias and newspapers. Some socialigists state that by investigating a great number of information resources, the power of critism and analyzing the information in people will be enhanced drastically. For the purpose of illustration, taking scientists as an example. If they want to prove a scientific theory, they should investigate all the before rejected theory and examine their theory by criticize the other theories which are related to their own.
In brief, contemplating all aforementioned reasons, one can draw the conclusion that to be a well-informed person, people should be received information by different knowledge resources chiefly due to having a wide perspective and taking a reasnable judgement reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d a great deal of attention from people an socialogists. Although some may argue t...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...cal decades, people has been exposed by a large number of information which is ardous to decide t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Getting
...see the issues through different sides. getting information from distintic sources, peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...int, If people decide to participate in a electral affair they should read or lis...
^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...al affair they should read or listen to all of the candidate news resources and by doing t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'established'.
Suggestion: established
...nformation. Furthermore, it has been establish beyond the doubt that criticize of the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in brief, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38378378378 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09913628723 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1581154286 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.285714286 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229447013317 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812619653252 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765247134789 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14948660077 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358340707748 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.