TPO43- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
• Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
• Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
• Say nothing.
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether students or people should Correct a wrong statement in the classroom or postpone it to the end of the class and speak to the teacher or leader individually has received a great deal of attention from students and peopl. Altough some may argue that it is better to correct the teachers' statements in front of other students to prevent them from inaccurate information, I as well as many others believe that one of the best way to do in these circumstances is to talk personally by the speaker at the end of the class or meeting, and the following explanations will furhter elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, a paramount reason why it is better to wait until the last of the class is that interrupting people on the middle of their speech is not pliote and it is not acceptable by the sociality rules. In addition, patient could be more beneficial in these conditions due to the reason that the speakers might provide some strong evidence for their expressions; so, the students could be agreed in this way. Also, people virtually would not be satisfied when they are corrected in front of a popualation; thus, the might take a guard through this correction and do not accurate their speech. For instance, when I was in high school, during one of my history class, our teacher stated fact about the history of india which was wrong. One of my friend ceased her speak and attempted to say the correct information. As a result, the teacher got angry and sebt her away out of the class due to the reason that she think she were insulted by this student.
A further reason for this view is that correcting people during their speech might have some harmf ule effects, since they might loose their confident to speak either on the class or the meetings. It is sometimes said that some people who is corrected in their speech by one of the audience would not be able to continue their states due the the fact they might think that people could not trust their speech anymore.
I brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I can draw the conclusion that correction people's speech in front of other not only decrease their confidance but also might make a conflict during the meeting or class time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ome harmf ule effects, since they might loose their confident to speak either on the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ot be able to continue their states due the the fact they might think that people could...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ot be able to continue their states due the the fact they might think that people could...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6975 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59359668222 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6572332687 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.818181818 100.406767564 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3636363636 20.6045352989 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151999032306 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638955133475 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339915648984 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849017936419 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436519942073 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.002688172 280% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.