Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In the modern century, the augmenting volume of wastes producing by people has become a crucial issue. There are two underlying factors causing this problem, however, there are two practical solutions to deal with.
First of all, the more people tend to buy various products, the more rubbish would be produced. to explain, during the last decades companies have been promoting the false needs among societies to sale their products. This promotion could result in a needless raising demand in providing a huge volume of goods. By entering those volume of new products each day, the production of rubbish after using them would increase as well. A good example could be plenty of cellphone that each year are augmented to waste cycle. Moreover, the growing trend of population on earth caused a pressure ecosystem since each person normally produces 10kg wastes annually. As a result, this increasing population would affect waste producing adversely.
On the other hand, conducting a comprehensive program, governments could decline this rubbish production. At the beginning, they should inform the people at the basis level such as pre-school. Children should be taught to control their throwaway habbits as well as buying unessential products. This acknowledgment could enhance societie’s perspectives in a long-term. Furthermore, companies should be obligated to use more environmental-friendly materials. Those materials would decompose both faster and easier, subsequently, the waste volume would decrease. Eventually, international organizations such as UN along with countries should establish a program in order to monitor and control this population explosion to maintain the earth in the future, effectively.
In conclusion, I believe that the new lifestyle of this century could be a significant factor in producing more rubbish compared to the past. It is governments’ duties to raise people‘s awareness about the consequences of this style on the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ts, the more rubbish would be produced. to explain, during the last decades compan...
^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this volume' or 'those volumes'?
Suggestion: this volume; those volumes
...ing a huge volume of goods. By entering those volume of new products each day, the productio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cellphone seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of cellphones'.
Suggestion: plenty of cellphones
...crease as well. A good example could be plenty of cellphone that each year are augmented to waste c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ould enhance societie’s perspectives in a long-term. Furthermore, companies should be oblig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60132890365 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13513552088 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611295681063 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3300187521 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137263720098 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453105193432 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448047988702 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931363063491 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418668729718 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.