TPO29
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of doubt, the quality of education plays an undeniable/striking role in headway of every society. A controversial question is that whether increasing the salary of the university professors promote the level of education or not. Some people are inclined towards that high income of academic members would have the positive effect on promoting the quality of education, while others believe this option does not practical. I do find the idea of the former group more in accordance with that of mine; to support my stands, in the course of this essay, I aptly substantiate my viewpoints.
To begin with, paying attention to the professors' salary could provide a circumstance to enhance the level of the university. It is crystal clear that professors are not only the fabric of the university, but also the prime of the society. In this way, universities could absorb more sophisticated and skilled professors, and this brings about that more talented students penchant to attend these universities and enjoy the high qualified staffs' knowledge. As an example, I would like to mention my own experience, several years ago, when I wanted to choose the university, while I had got admission of many top and high ranking universities in my country, I chose Tabriz University because of a well-known professor who was there. In the light of the aforementioned arguments, I can say that offering high wage to professors could help to improve the level of the collages.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that high wage could be a decent element to motivate professors and inspire unexpected boost in their career. Suffice to say that reasonable salary could pave the way towards the build the constructive competition among the academic members. It is witnessed that well-paid/highly-paid individuals often persuade into their tasks more than others, no matter who they are, this policy would be workable to prospers either future career of the students and improving quality of university. To illustrate my point, I want to mention some statistics. The results of the survey which is recently conducted in my country express that in any university which its professors are satisfied about their salary, are more enthusiasm and this leads the society to prominent headway. Enthusiastic professors are able to make their students enthusiastic about their field too, and this inspired the students to learn more.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that spending more money about professors' salary closely tied the prosperous of not only the university, but also the society. Since benefits of this perspective clearly outweigh its disadvantages; I would strongly advocate the fact that high salary would be practical factor for improving of quality of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Without any shadow of doubt, the quality...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I aptly substantiate my viewpoints. To begin with, paying attention to the p...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... To begin with, paying attention to the professors salary could provide a circumstance to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nd this brings about that more talented students penchant to attend these universities a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o improve the level of the collages. Another reason which deserves to say som...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 971, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is inspired the students to learn more. In brief, contemplating all the a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26872246696 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05900431889 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530837004405 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2784680308 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.705882353 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7058823529 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173526843915 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545207599716 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037081313776 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115256512791 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243288340351 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.