Clear communication through classes or meetings are essential for both leaders and followers. If the teacher or the meeting leader provides the wrong information, I firmly believe the best thing to do is to interrupt the mistake immediately, and my reasons are as follows.
First and foremost, receiving and digesting the correct information or knowledge is the most important thing for a learner during the meeting or class, and correcting the mistake made by leaders can effectively avoid everyone from being misled. For example, I still remember one day during the training session of my first job, our boss was teaching marketing 4P concepts to newcomers, yet she seemed to accidentally write a wrong definition for Promotion, one of 4P concepts. I found everyone kept writing down their notes without noticing the mistake, so I raised my hand right away and pointed out my query. Our boss then correct the meaning soon. After the training section, some employees told me they deeply appreciated my correction. Without telling the mistakes, everyone will take wrong notes and memorize the false concepts.
Secondly, interaction between leaders and learners or staffs is crucial for a successful meeting, and pointing something incorrect well stimulates more discussions. That is to say, the leader may look into the problematic parts and even elaborate more details about the reason why he made the mistake. Or maybe other students will provide their viewpoints accordingly. As a result, the whole meeting will have more mutual interaction between participants and speakers, and generate more positive impacts or ideas. For example, when I was at university in my freshman year, one time, I found statistics professor wrote a wrong formula, and I interrupted her and told her the mistake straight away. Surprisingly, our professor just laugh and told us she intended to make the mistake and wanted to see if anyone found the mistake.Since this was a really important formula, and she hoped all students can raise some questions and interact with her rather than receiving what she said and taking all the formula for granted.
To conclude, I believe the best way to do when finding some mistake made by leaders is to correct them immediately since all students should gaspe the correct knowledge and it is beneficial for the mutual communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs. If the teacher or the meeting leader provides the wrong information, I firmly...
^^
Line 5, column 828, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Since
...nted to see if anyone found the mistake.Since this was a really important formula, an...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aking all the formula for granted. To conclude, I believe the best way to do w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, for example, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19947506562 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83487410375 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569553805774 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7461110086 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.066666667 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195492061013 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666391781208 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657010822065 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140800671792 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632240634946 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.