In my opinion, traveling and visiting other countries is one of the best ways to increase knowledge and experiences. Some of these experiences are desirable, and someone is not. However, I think gaining different experiences is valuable. Having exciting or frustrating traveling depends on an individual's intuition and expectations. We should see the glass half full.
Traveling to ancient countries like Iran could yield an amazing and unique experience. However, consider some advice. First of all, I suppose that study about that country you want to go to. Study about their cultures and imagine that you are in that situation. Having a good schedule for spending each day is vital. Find important places and book a hotel near them. for example, I traveled to China three years ago. I studied about this country and set a good schedule that caused it to be one of the best travel I had.
The second point I would like to mention is that traveling needs someone pretty familiar with the circumstance. She or he could help to have desirable and useful travel. Especially in ancient countries like Iran, you need to have a good tour leader. You could become aware of untold stories about monuments. Also, having a good purchase is one of the other advantages you can gain. For instance, in my country, the currency is a little confusing. We have two parallel currencies. one is written on the money, and one is used in speaking. Rial and Toman, so having a good tour leader for traveling to my country could be helpful.
To sum up, traveling is an exclusive opportunity that you should not miss up on, and do it before you get too rusty.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... or frustrating traveling depends on an individuals intuition and expectations. We should s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...tant places and book a hotel near them. for example, I traveled to China three year...
^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...using. We have two parallel currencies. one is written on the money, and one is use...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77816901408 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68159868985 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1688438239 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 59.0 100.406767564 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.347826087 20.6045352989 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162682619428 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439594948305 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036714653378 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978439239042 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237436468559 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... or frustrating traveling depends on an individuals intuition and expectations. We should s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...tant places and book a hotel near them. for example, I traveled to China three year...
^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...using. We have two parallel currencies. one is written on the money, and one is use...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77816901408 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68159868985 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1688438239 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 59.0 100.406767564 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.347826087 20.6045352989 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162682619428 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439594948305 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036714653378 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978439239042 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237436468559 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.