Traveling to the tourist's attractions is better or quiet places to release stress on vacation.
By and large, it is beyond doubt that human works like an animal to succeed in life. In this regard, taking a break mentally and physically is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars whether a person should visit the tourist attraction sites of a foreign country or go to a calm and relaxing place to get pleasure. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of going to the famous places of a foreign country for a better vacation. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my opinion is that the tourist attractions are more adventurous places to visit due to the diversity of people present there. Tourists from different parts of the continents travel to the most famous places of other countries to enjoy their vacations. It is notable that the idea of meeting multi-cultured and multi lingual people at one spot is very enthusiastic. This interaction between people resulted very beneficial to relieve their stress. They talk about the traditions and lives of different countries and could find a way to have a stress-free life. By way of illustration, last year, I went to Pakistan to visit the Badshahi mosque in the city of Lahore. I must say the view was breathtaking. No doubt why it is a tourist attraction in Pakistan. There were all casts of people were there. While we were enjoying the view there, we encountered a couple and started to get along with them. What I found was they were dealing with the same problem we had. They were concerned about starting a family and looked really worried. Fortunately, I and my husband had gone through this situation. We guided them in the best possible way to relieve their worries. It really helped them to get relaxed mentally about having kids. This example clearly illustrates my reason.
The second rationale behind my viewpoint is rooted in the fact that it is more fun to see the wonders of a particular country because going to other boring places would be a waste of time. When people plan a trip, they usually look up online the famous spots of a particular foreign country they intend to go to. It is crystal clear that nowadays people make videos for their Youtube channel to promote the beauty of the world. They find it more exciting to visit the places which are famous for their unique sights. As a result, people go there to spend their vacation. As a case in mind, I and my husband go to a foreign country every year during a vacation to take a break from our work and daily worries. Last year we went to Turkey to visit their grand museums and mosques. It was a very exciting and refreshing trip as found it really fun to go there.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although the peaceful areas give a sense of calm and relaxation to the mind, a country's enchanting places are worth visiting. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth mentioning: first, diverse people are present at tourists spot, secondly, it is more fun to see famous places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...axing place to get pleasure. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of goi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 842, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'funs'?
Suggestion: funs
... and refreshing trip as found it really fun to go there. By perusing the above par...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as for, no doubt, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2549.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 546.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6684981685 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60654885408 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9191093567 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2258064516 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6129032258 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32258064516 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137747893622 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319705773814 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499265929903 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818735031331 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341503391424 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.