Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this Modern Era, technology has profoundly uncomplicated the means of communication among people. While working on diverse schemes, students or colleagues make sure their way of liaising is very adequate to get the paramount consequences. Some would prefer to interact in person whereas others would go for contemporary means of communication by using technology. As far as my opinion is concerned about the statement, I really do not agree that when classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. I believe that e-mail is really a recommended way to interface with others. To justify my viewpoint, I will mention two reasons in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, as a matter of fact, email is an extremely convenient approach because it saves time. When you are working in a facility with your workmates, you can send messages from your seat and you do not have to walk to that person's cabin because it would waste your time or you might get distracted on your way back to your compartment. Moreover, if your coworker is not available physically at work you can still approach him to ask or tell him anything about the project you are doing together. My personal experience is a profound example of that. I, as a doctor, working at a busy hospital, do not have time to go to the second floor to discuss the charts of patients related to research I am doing with other doctors. So I prefer to e-mail them because it is very convenient for me as I can do more work related to research in less time. As you can see, it is clear that working through e-mail is a profitable method.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that e-mail is a kind of communication in written form which assists to reunderstand if you miss a point which could be very important for your task. If classmates discuss an assignment in front of each other, they are more prone to forget things after negotiation. However, if the conversation is through e-mail, it is going to be saved there and you can access the information, whenever you feel the need to elucidate an important thing. Drawing from my friend's experience, last summer we were doing a final research assignment on the Anatomy of the heart as a team. We discussed all the points which we will be including in the article, in college. But when she went home, she forgot the names of valves of the heart when writing the article. We had only one day left to submit our assignment so she e-mailed me quickly to ask about it and I texted her all the details. She had the names of all valves in written form so it got easy for her to understand. If it was up to meeting in person we would have failed in our class. Therefore, with the help of modern technology, better work is produced.
In the light of the above-stated reasons, I strongly believe that progressive work is carried out by e-mail instead of in person because not only it is convenient and saves time but also makes you understand things better in written form.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1023, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m so it got easy for her to understand. If it was up to meeting in person we would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, kind of, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2539.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64168190128 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73705544625 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475319926874 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9036403367 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.791666667 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7916666667 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382604759584 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932171805184 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111062586928 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225298357383 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109667351772 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.