I think a university education should be charged. I think this, because if universities were free, they would always be overflowing with students. This is bad, because the universities would be overwhelmed and won't be able to take care of it, thus this means that the education would not be as good as now.
Firstly, the universities would have too many students. This is bad in many ways. The education would not be good. The amount of students would deteriorate the amount of studying done. Second point, is that more students would mean more professors. Therefore, more professors would mean more money out the drain.
Starting off from that point, less money would mean less materials. Things such as laptops, or computers would mean no studying with technology. There would also be less people paying to enter the school, so the whole school would have to use funds, and would most likely be poor. Even places like a public school would charge you.
Finally, less materials. This could be very devastating. The school could have been a great school, even such as Harvard, but once they did not charge money, they would not have materials. The future is full of technology. Without technology, the students would not be able to use future predicaments.
All universities should put charges. Without those charges, the school would be doing nothing but making the students go backwards in teaching. Money is one of the main parts of school, and without it, many things would go wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun materials is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... from that point, less money would mean less materials. Things such as laptops, or c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ng with technology. There would also be less people paying to enter the school, so t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun materials is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...c school would charge you. Finally, less materials. This could be very devastati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, so, therefore, thus, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 252.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96825396825 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55952073336 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 212.727598566 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1398045144 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.619047619 100.406767564 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0 20.6045352989 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139250003817 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580380716598 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641413955686 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906988475034 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522364392493 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 58.1214874552 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.36 8.01818996416 79% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 86.8835125448 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.