University has 2 programs for students in break time between 2 semesters. Which one do you prefer?
1) Taking some courses or classes which have no connection with your major,
2) Take work project (working in city, or in school to teach children to overcome/do their homework.
Today, there are many universities which study in different titles such as a biology, a phsycology, a mathematics, an engineering, etc in the world. Almost all of them, use many techniques for their students. Some of these techniques impact well than another techniques. Both of given methods have their advantages and disadvantages.
First of all, let's think the first method that taking some courses of classes which have no connection with students' major titles. The most parts of students' brain less effective in their durable lessons, because they always concentrate same things in their books and they implement the similar lab assignments. In that way, there are many other options for students, and all of these matters influenced students thoughts positively. And, the brain of students' would be flexible in that method.
Also, some students would like to be a social, for that they always do different things such as playing games, going to cinema, chatting on the internet apps. Although, they have many activities a few parts of them want to join classes without their own schools. And, that method provides that approach which wanted by students.
Let's consider the second method that taking work project. In that way, there could be the teacher who teach student or working in the company which about students' titles. Several students want to work on their graduations. And, this way offer student more experiences and examples about their lessons. Then, students levels improve up a high rank.
In contrast, in the second method there is a few bad issues such as that causes tiredness because student make an effort obviously, and they do not concentrate their lessons enough. In some countries, that way not offered to students.
In conclusion, taking account of all above pros. and cons. I definitely agree the first statement that all students should take and attend another courses outside of their universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... cinema, chatting on the internet apps. Although, they have many activities a few parts ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... approach which wanted by students. Lets consider the second method that taking ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries, that way not offered to students. In conclusion, taking account of all abo...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... that way not offered to students. In conclusion, taking account of all above...
^^
Line 11, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...sion, taking account of all above pros. and cons. I definitely agree the first stat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, then, well, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20063694268 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61981150254 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547770700637 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.572405729 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.65 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239364541006 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724868765957 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711306505162 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121771738317 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550235443013 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.