Nowadays, universities attach greater importance to adapt measures to provide students with better education. Some people are of the point that it is required for every student in universities to take public speaking course with the aim of providing them with more successful future career. In my opinion, however, it is not preferable for all students to learn it due to the following reasons.
One of the most interesting aspects of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that taking public speaking course as a requirement poses a threat on students’ study. For one thing, it is widely known that nowadays students have plenty of subjects and excessive homework to deal with. Plus, in order to consolidate the knowledge, they are likely to need to spend a lot of time in previewing, reviewing and so on. However, adding another compulsory course, the public speaking course, will take up plenty of their time and add more stuff to their original working load which will impose an even tighter and busier schedule on students. Therefore, taking this course may give them a hard time allocating their energy. As a result, they may be subject to losing focus on their original academic subjects. Therefore, taking public speaking course for all the students is detrimental to students’ study.
Another noteworthy aspect of the ongoing discussion which needs to be reflected is that requiring every student to take public speaking course is harmful for their all-around development. Taking the public speaking course will encourage students to cultivate their public speaking skill. However, in order to be successful in their future career, it is imperative for students to take part in all kinds of extracurricular activities in their spare time, accumulating both theoretical knowledge and practical skills. In other words, there is no guarantee that taking public speaking course will result in a successful future career. Choosing public speaking course as a compulsory course lays too much emphasis on public speaking skill that will distract students’ attention from attending other activities , like doing part time job, field research, travelling, sports and so on. Students ought to do things both indoor and outdoor, both theoretical and practical in order to be a versatile person. Thus, an ideal situation for universities is to offer a bunch of courses which develop different skills and personalities to give students the chances to choose themselves.
Admittedly, taking public speaking course does have advantages. It can help students to conquer the fear of public speaking and have a better performance when speaking publicly. However, better options are available, for instance, offer courses to the students who need to improve their public speaking skills so that they can improve themselves in the spare time.
From what have been discussed above, it is not a discreet choice to require all students to take public speaking course due to the adverse effect it would bring to students' student and all-rounded development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...s and cultivate personalities. By doing part time job, they can acquire job experience an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, of course, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2470.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28907922912 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83358899633 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460385438972 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5088161174 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.391304348 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3043478261 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284157235941 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116950348076 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863498435169 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213898729961 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00824043797866 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.