Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, people attach greater importance to adapting measures to improve their working or studying accuracy. The controversy has been surrounded that whether people should interrupt and correct the mistake right away during class or conferences or leave it later. Some people are of the opinion that waiting to the end is prefereable beacuse interruption seems too rude to them. In my opinion, however, it is more advantageous to point that out immediately.
One interesting aspect of the current discussion that demands a keen discussion is that correcting teachers' mistakes exerts positive influence to students' study efficiency. Asking things that student's don't understand or correcting things that they think are incorrect is the process of critical thinking, resulting in a more thoroughly understanding and grasping of what they are being taught. However, if a student leave his question till the end of the class, he may forget what the question it is. Plus, the teacher himself may don't remember either, as he spoke too much information to remember every single detail. Thus, the professor are not be able to provide a satisfying respond. In addition, saying nothing about is the worst situation. If the teacher does convey a wrong message, students will be disguised for long time if no one says anything. As you can see, speaking out immediately is the superior choice.
Another important aspect of this case that needs to be reflected on is that pointing out a mistake of a leader is beneficial for the quality of the work. If no one dares to question the obvious mistakes made by a leader and all the people keep going on the wrong track, all the errors will end up on the final performance of their work. The person who is gonna pay the bill for this mistake is the boss himself. There is a saying that "Two heads are better one". As a leader of team, it is always necessary to encourage employees to express their own opinions so that people can discuss and learn from each other's different perspectives in order to pursue high quality in work. Thus, expression their thought about leader's idea is crutial for the quality of their work.
Admittedly, some interruption and embarrassment brought by the pointing out is conspicuous. However, as long as people have a open mind about it, it is still beneficial for people's study and work.
Consequently, from what I have discussed, it is advantageous to speak out mistakes immediately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...efficiency. Asking things that students dont understand or correcting things that th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...on it is. Plus, the teacher himself may dont remember either, as he spoke too much i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...gle detail. Thus, the professor are not be able to provide a satisfying respond. I...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...icuous. However, as long as people have a open mind about it, it is still benefic...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, still, thus, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82061755698 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6008060299 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0952380952 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5238095238 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155545020034 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430740798737 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360040871143 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763212692316 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471652391257 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.