Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?a) Interrupt and correct the mistake right away, b) Wait until the class or meeti

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?

a) Interrupt and correct the mistake right away, b) Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader, c) Say nothing.

Throughout history, people didn't know what they should do when a person in a meeting or a class makes a mistake and says a wrong point. Some people prefer to say to he/she right away and correct his/her mistake. However, I firmly believe in waiting until the class or meeting is over and say his/her mistake. There are two reasons why I think this is critically important, which I will elaborate in the following essay.

The first remarkable point to be mentioned is that interrupting and correcting the mistake right away causes a person to forget everything that he/she wants to say later. Also, the other people confuse and may don't understand the points of the meeting and the class. My individual experience is a compelling example of this. Several years ago, I worked at a well-known company. Once a week, my manager held a meeting to report our works. When I have presented my data and reported them, I made a little mistake in my accounting. During my presentation, one of my colleagues said: "you are making a mistake." After that, I couldn't re-presented again because he interrupted me.

The second reason I would like to mention is that correcting the mistake right away causes become chaotic in the meeting; it means people speak to each other and cause a lot of noises in the meeting or the class. And in this circumstance controlling the meeting or the class is very hard. Back to the previous example, When he spoke between my presentation, the meeting was full of noises ,and I couldn't control the meeting. After a while, we had to cancel our meeting. This example demonstrates we shouldn't interrupt and correct the mistake right away.

To wrap it up, All the reasons to be mentioned above show we should wait until the end of class or the meeting, then talk to the teacher or meeting leader and correct his/her mistake. This is because correcting the mistake right away causes a person to forget everything that he/she wants to say, and, become chaotic in the meeting or the class.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
Throughout history, people didnt know what they should do when a person ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... Also, the other people confuse and may dont understand the points of the meeting an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e making a mistake.' After that, I couldnt re-presented again because he interrupt...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...entation, the meeting was full of noises ,and I couldnt control the meeting. After...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
..., the meeting was full of noises ,and I couldnt control the meeting. After a while, we ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...r meeting. This example demonstrates we shouldnt interrupt and correct the mistake right...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, second, so, then, well, while, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75714285714 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6708769484 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494285714286 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5491986685 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61111111111 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305638408652 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958782914578 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668036105469 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208712606163 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570690926468 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.