Watching television is bad for children. Do you agree or disagree?

A controversial debate which is raised about the pros and cons of children watching television. Some groups of people hold the view that watching television is entertaining for children. However, some other groups may hold an opposing view and feel that it is more harmful. From my vantage view, I concur with the latter groups and believe that watching television may contributes negatively to children health, simultaneously, it also distracts children from doing their home works.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that watching television do more harm than good. There are some programs on television which children are not allowed to watch. For instance, programs like porn movies, crime scenarios, and death penalties. A vivid example to illustrate my point is the movie that broadcasted on television the other day. It was horrifying that most kids who watched it could not sleep at night. Moreover, children who watch such movies often develop nightmares which ultimately may result in difficulties in falling asleep.

The second point which deserves some words is that television may have negative effect on children's health .Often children who watch television for a long period of time develop a sedentary life style A habit which may not only cause an increase in weight, but also obesity. Moreover, children may be victims of bad advertisements that are directed to change children's habits.

Although the aforementioned reasons are fist to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible statistics published in children Heath Journal. The study reviled that watching television may lead to the development of attentive deficit syndrome. A type of disease which could affect the intelligence capabilities of children

To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one's soon realizes that children could be adversely affected by watching television. Thus, it is the parents responsibility to be cautions and warn their children.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in difficulties in falling asleep. The second point which deserves some wor...
^^^
Line 6, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...have negative effect on childrens health .Often children who watch television for ...
^^
Line 6, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Often
...ve negative effect on childrens health .Often children who watch television for a lon...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 156, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hildren who watch television for a long period of time develop a sedentary life style A habit ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...by watching television. Thus, it is the parents responsibility to be cautions and warn ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, for instance, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41230769231 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98642926642 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1171921611 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7222222222 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32725850634 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108015104116 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779742392331 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186972400865 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650099047033 0.0645574589148 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.