We all worked together with some people. Some people’s views are very similar to us, while others people’s views contradict to our view. Those whose views are parallel to us are more close to us, on the other hand those views are different from us; they are not likely to close with us. There are many characteristics for a good co-worker possesses which includes trust, good behavior, zero partiality, no concealing, language friendly, etc. Variations in such characteristics may leads to small level or large level conflicts among workers. I have explained my opinion in the following lines.
Firstly, a person to be a good co-worker, he/she should be language friendly. In short, language barrier should be avoided. Since language is the only source from which human being convey their ideas, thoughts and feeling to others, language barrier can make hurdle to communication. For example, in India, Andra Pradesh region has its own language and people of this county can hardly be able to speak national language. So if a person from AP has to communicate with other region person, language barrier will definitely break communication among those.
Secondly, a co-worker should not make indifference or partiality with others on the basis on cast, race, complexion, social status, etc. It may lead to conflicts. If a coworker able avoid such partiality, definitely he/she will be a good partner for any person and wonderful things will happen in friendship. On the other hand, if a person is biased towards partiality on cast, race or complexion, other people will heedless to make him as a partner.
Last but not least, a good coworker should be honest, trustworthy, well-experienced. If a person is not trustworthy and concealing his thoughts to deceive other people, can anyone will try to make friendship with him? Of course, not. Moreover, self-important or people like jealous play a vital factor to break the partnership. Such people just think about themselves without considering the circumstances and situations of other people.
In conclusion, a good worker should possess a lot of excellent communication skills and characteristics. This characteristics include language friendly, unbiased, honest, trustworthy, well-experienced in a particular field, etc. Hence, a language factor plays a very dynamic role for deciding who should be the best co-worker. In addition, to keep partnership for a long time, both side persons should have trust on each other as disguising activity may create serious conflicts.
- Claim: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's major field of study.Reason: Acquiring knowleadge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.66
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit29
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon66
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ses which includes trust, good behavior, zero partiality, no concealing, language...
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO
Message: Did you mean ''?
...o be a good co-worker, he/she should be language friendly. In short, language barrier sh...
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
...mmunication skills and characteristics. This characteristics include language friend...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in short, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33084577114 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12307563085 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554726368159 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3270172454 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2916666667 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155235977238 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485962254365 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759827661694 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848515495212 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640953376147 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.