We should be honest with our friend
Throughout history, human beings have been always looking for some honest friends on whom they can rely. Although there is a widespread consensus on the issue that honesty is the most significant characteristics of two close friends, people occasionally have to neglect this important fact. A plethora of people believe that friends should remain honest under different situations, but I, to a great extent, support the opposing perspective since I think people have to neglect moral principles like honesty in some special situations. My reasons are manifold, among which the most conspicuous ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that almost all relations encounter difficulties after some years. For this reason, individuals may be placed in a cumbersome situation in which they cannot find any other solution except telling a lie in order to maintain their relationship. To clarify, consider two persons, intimate friends, having a long lasting friendship. When one of them make a mistake in which he even does not hurt the other one, but he is unwilling to tell the truth since it is a private matter, he most probably makes his attempt to hide the fact from his friend. Therefore, he cannot be honest as always, on the grounds that he feel uneasy about stating the truth.
Beyond a shadow of a doubt, people's reaction in many cases may differ based on the occasion. In other words, ones act differently when they face various conditions. If a person is honest, he should tell the fact completely. Therefore, it may bring about some unexpected consequences at a later time such as emotional hurts, for it is plausible that people are shocked while they face an unexpected happening. For instance, some years ago, I had to tell one of my best friend a painful news about his parents' accident. Under this circumstance, I distorted the story in order to make the situation less terrible since I knew telling the truth may hurt his feeling. Therefore, I told the fact after some time when I understood he was prepared for listening the true story.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that although at first blush being honest seems to be inevitable part of friendship, in some situation it cannot be helped, and we have to tell a white lie. Not only does it contributes to keeping our relations, but it also prevents causing numerous difficulties. However, it is highly recommended that individuals put their efforts to be honest as much as possible, but they should also consider other aspects of telling the truth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'painful news'.
Suggestion: painful news
...go, I had to tell one of my best friend a painful news about his parents accident. Under this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contribute'?
Suggestion: contribute
...e to tell a white lie. Not only does it contributes to keeping our relations, but it also p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contribute'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: contribute
...e to tell a white lie. Not only does it contributes to keeping our relations, but it also p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, such as, in many cases, in other words, to sum up, to a great extent, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01360544218 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85629149033 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0246173497 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.368421053 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15789473684 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240831659233 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06561843268 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726557604667 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14987564957 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850003466492 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.