whatif
These decades have witnessed unparalleled boom in all manner of social media, including newspapers, TV spectacles, and prevailing Internet. It's indisputable that we do possess manifold means to glean information we need expeditiously, and this trend has considerably triggered our indifferent responses towards history. Since seemingly we have already got copious ways to assimilate knowledge, the significance of history can comparatively been lightened. Notwithstanding this current development, I steadfastly sustain the idea that the essence we extract from the history are like concrete framework of the architecture, without which we can collapse quickly for we are devoid of the underlying ability to examine the tracks of our society.
Primarily, the history serves as a mirror to reflect the blunders and achievements, the peaks and troughs that once happened in past vividly, from these records, the government can imbibe some experience, ruminate more comprehensively to make the wise decision. In even broader sense, the moral principles encompassed in the history enable a country to run in an organized and systematic way. On the part of administrators, to explore deeply into the history is to feed them wisdom to contend with external hurdles shrewdly at the lowest cost. Taking the Chinese government as an example, the established pattern it inherited from the old period has worked wonders when it navigates complex affairs. Bearing in mind to prioritize peace and development over all other things, China has gained acclaimed reputation across the world and lay a solid foundation for its further progress.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 249.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54618473896 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17488104966 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.698795180723 0.524837075471 133% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2633800497 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.444444444 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.45110844103 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 58.1214874552 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.01818996416 137% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.