Nowadays, technology is improving at an unprecedented rate. Every day a new product finds its way to the market. Therefore, there are diversified opinions on whether it is a better decision to buy a nascent product right after its introduction or if people should wait and purchase the new product after a certain amount of time, for instance, after some weeks or months. Despite the fact that some people hold the idea that people should purchase the new product as soon as those products proceed to the market, I believe otherwise, maintaining that it is more rational to not act hasty and wait until the product finds its place in the market. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that usually, products at first days or weeks of their entrance to the market are so expensive. Their price is unreasonably high, and this is because of the marketing. According to marketing strategies, people tend to buy relatively expensive products because they think this high price accounts for higher quality. Companies take advantage of this well-accepted belief and introduce their products at the maximum allowable price. On the other hand, after some weeks or months, the price of that product will decline, and the company will lower its price deliberately to compete with other companies in the high-competitive today's market. Therefore, this reason manifests that it makes more sense not to be precipitant in purchasing new technological devices. The longer people wait after a new product has been introduced, the cheaper they can buy that product.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that new devices usually have many defects and flaws. Nowadays, the competition rate between companies offering the same devices is so high, leaving companies no choice but to enter their product earlier than their rival to dominate the market. This hastiness put a lot of pressure on the company's manufacturing section, which increases the likelihood of flaws. After monitoring the devices, the companies gradually modify these defects and offer more reliable products. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that not being too hasty in purchasing recent-introduced devices is the most promising factor to rational purchasing.
To make the long story short, many people are in favor of being known as the first person who has made purchases for a new technological device for one reason or another. Nevertheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that does not only having patience in buying novel devices prevent people from dissipating their money, but it also ensures them that their device will be devoid of any flaws.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18534482759 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83383128158 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523706896552 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1708758589 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.631578947 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191575934855 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589190895736 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469942162157 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126810914161 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348028376532 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.