I utterly agree with the concept that, students learn better and have more efficiacious function when they are working in groups rather than being all alone. I support this ground because of the fact that students exploit more from others' interpretation and frame of mind in groups. The competival and more enthusiastic working and the more insight over the project are the other superior reasons why I believe this way.
First I think that, in groups children can get familiar with other studetns prespectives. It is very common that we make a scheme and after mentioning and representing it for someone else we became to this understanding that, we haven't noticed some other details. We all have our own blind sides and when it comes to group works these blind sides start to fade away and we get to look at a scheme from different points of views that each of the goroup members have. Thus a team project will be more complete than a solo project.
Furthermore, I hold this believe that children are more effected by their friends and others on their same age tha their teacher. Teachers although are mostly accliamed and respected by students but, when it comes to friends they totally act differently. Children know their friends as themselves like they are one and thus, any opinion for a daily wearing clothes to how should a project go has more impact on them. In fact I hold this belief that a friendly atmosphere not only will be more interesting for the pupils and they will learn more from their groupmates but also will make the project more competional and they will work with more perseverance and altogether so they would be the first and better than others.
At last the other thing that worth a word is that group project has the advantage of this that the pupils get to review their research when they are sharing it with others. When an indivitual has the duty to compelete a project or search about somthing, it is less likely to review it every now and then. On the other hand, when you are in a team after completing your part of the research you must have a gatherign with the others to talk about it and these gathering might even bring up some controversies in which students should have enough insight throw their research to be able to convince the other parties.
In conclusion, the statistics show that group projects are eigthy percent more successful than the sole ones. Although some introverted people might prefer the sole projects but as it is mentioned the utilization of other peoples' prospective, the fun friendly dominant atmosphere and at the end more reviewing and deeper understadign over the project are only some of the immediate effects that group projects engift the students with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I utterly agree with the concept that, s...
^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...e with the concept that, students learn better and have more efficiacious function whe...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... being all alone. I support this ground because of the fact that students exploit more from others inter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uperior reasons why I believe this way. First I think that, in groups children c...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...e became to this understanding that, we havent noticed some other details. We all have...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s that each of the goroup members have. Thus a team project will be more complete th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be more complete than a solo project. Furthermore, I hold this believe that ch...
^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...lo project. Furthermore, I hold this believe that children are more effected by thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ends as themselves like they are one and thus, any opinion for a daily wearing cl...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be the first and better than others. At last the other thing that worth a wor...
^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...omthing, it is less likely to review it every now and then. On the other hand, when you are in a t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e able to convince the other parties. In conclusion, the statistics show that ...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... understadign over the project are only some of the immediate effects that group projects e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up projects engift the students with.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, then, thus, i think, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77004219409 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52210667777 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481012658228 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4524975066 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.3125 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.5376344086 253% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294041968072 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104288255752 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659632264781 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174663872336 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707450688138 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.