When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Work cause a great impact on individual lives. Students will learn more when they work together. However, working alone will build up confidence and responsibilities. Some people thinks that Teacher should assign project individually so that they work effectively and recognize their mistakes. However, others disagree, perhaps, according to them, the student will learn more and get a chance to interact with people. I certainly believe that Teacher should assign projects in groups and the reasons are described below.
First, The knowledge of student will increase by working in a group. Usually, in the group, teacher assigned different level of students.Their learning and absorbing powers are different from each individual. If one student could not understand any topic, other student will help that student. For example, when I was in high school, our chemistry teacher announced surprise quiz most of the time. She used to divide the student in groups because she knew that some of the students in class were not good in studies. She always encouraged them to answer. When a good student answered her question, many of the students learned from it. By that way, she emphasizes the importance of group and student will learn more in a group rather than alone.
Second, the student can finish their project within required time, so the project will consume less time. For instance, In my last year of pharmacy, the teacher of clinical pharmacy allocated the survey on a cancer drug usage. In the class, most of the student prefer that project separately because this was the last project and they want good marks in it. But, I took in the group, completed it before time. In a group, we had an advantage that we divide our work into two groups. One group went to the one location for survey and other went to the different location. Ultimately, we present our survey on the large population, while the other student who took that project, didn't complete their work within time limits and their survey range was not wider. This proves that there is a power in unity.
In conclusion, the teacher should allocate projects in a group, so that student learn the importance of working in a group. Because it will help in their future job and they will build up confidence by interacting with different people in groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'causes'.
Suggestion: causes
Work cause a great impact on individual lives. Stu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Their
...er assigned different level of students.Their learning and absorbing powers are diffe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...student in groups because she knew that some of the students in class were not good in stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he other student who took that project, didnt complete their work within time limits ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9641025641 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54435472368 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2214446917 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6666666667 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371745748191 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117794032481 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112576460167 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251473166977 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108895105585 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.