When you are deciding which of the two places to visit, should you discuss with someone who has visited the two places or read online and why?
Nowadays, with the development of public transportation, we are offered with multiple choices of places where we can visit, which results in that sometimes it is difficult to decide the place to visit. Some individuals prefer to schedule their traveling plans by reading online information, while others tend to discuss with someone who has visited there. Personally speaking, discussing with someone who once traveled there is a more terrific solution in deciding the place to visit and there are a couple of reasons to account for my option.
To begin with, it is trustworthy to discuss with my friend who once paid a visit to my destinations, provided that I ask my friend to offer me pieces of advise, they are likely to find out the schedule they once made or the traveling dairies they wrote to help me figure out which place is worthy of visiting. Conversely, the information displayed on the Internet is a more mixed bunch, lots of individuals provide useless or outdated information without regarding the potential effect they may exert on the following tourists. For instance, one of my friends, Rebecca paid a visit to Tokyo, the metropolis located in Japan and she had made a detailed outline of the trip in accordance with the experience that other tourists had shared online. She thought it should have been a satisfying trip with full preparation, nevertheless, she found that the schedule she made was impractical since pieces of information were outdated, for instance, the bus line and schedule had been altered and the restaurant she had booked was wholly different from what she had viewed online, which not only dampened her enthusiasm about Japan but also expended her a large amount of money. Hence, it is trustworthy to follow the guidance offered on the Internet and the friends surrounding us is the most plausible resources of traveling information.
What’s more, having a discussion with my close friend enables me to grasp the first-hand information about my destination. During the discussion, my friends are capable of sharing the details in their trip instead of telling me amounts of experience in a rut, which ensures me to evaluate the value of paying a visit to each city and enlightens me to explore unique places of interests existing in my destination. The research conducted to evaluate citizens’ satisfaction of traveling demonstrates that there is a propensity that citizens are more content with their trips by following their friends’ suggestions, while the individuals scheduled their trip by searching online information presents that they were irritated and would no longer visit there.
Admittedly, it is much convenient to decide which city to visit by gathering information online without asking friends for help. Nevertheless, taking the cost and satisfaction during the trip into consideration, the suggestions from friends who once paid a visit there ensures our trip is fulfilled with entertainment and relaxation, instead of potential annoyance caused by the unsatisfied experience in touring the places of interests, living in a crude restaurant.
In a nutshell, it is a terrific approach to decide the place I prefer to visit through a heated discussion with my friends since they are able to offer me lots of trustworthy information and perfect the schedule with the first-hand experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'advice' (a noun)?
Suggestion: advice
...t I ask my friend to offer me pieces of advise, they are likely to find out the schedu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2824.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 543.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20073664825 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02238841439 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467771639042 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 888.3 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.8801653924 48.9658058833 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 201.714285714 100.406767564 201% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.7857142857 20.6045352989 188% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254807482561 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112727712932 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856515658511 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187167639368 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107972965043 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 11.7677419355 191% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.