whether or not children should be allowed doing whatever they want
With the advent of human modern society, the necessity of having a plan for performing tasks have been increasingly augmented. It is crystal clear that an appropriate plan plays a pivotal role in one's success. Different people have distinct perspectives in regard to whether or not children should be allowed doing whatever they want. Personally, I, to a great extent, take the opposite point of view, and I believe that it is better that children participate in activities which are related to their education. My reasons are manifold, among which the most significant ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that children are not mature enough to make proper decisions about their life. In other words, they do not have a lot of experience under their belt, and they do not consider different aspects of issues. Therefore, other individuals such as their parents or even experts should determine the most essential activities for children since they are knowledgeable and experienced enough. For example, school's activities are often orgnazied by some authorities who possess huge information about a wide variety of areas. As a result, they know what are the most and critical needs for their society, and based on these facts, they direct students and assign the details which books and assignments contain.
In addition to the higher level of knowledge and information of older people in comparison to the young adults, we cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that human being is ignorant. As a matter of fact, people usually do not follow what is necessary for their success in spite of their awareness toward those matters. For this reason, almost all children are not able to follow a strict rule although they are aware of its consequences on the future. To clarify, consider a seven-year-old kid who is going to select his daily plan. He most probably prefer to play with his peers and watch the tube instead of doing assignments. Hence, after a long run he will become lazy, and he won't put his afford to reach his goal in his life. Consequently, children are able to utilize their time more properly when they have some organized activities. Briefly, the most organized plan one has, the less time he/she wastes.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that children should spend more time on doing their homeworks and participating in some organized activities related to their education. Not only does it contributes to enjoying a better plan in terms of including necessary activities which will be required in the future, but it also helps them to avoid wasting time and use it efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ppropriate plan plays a pivotal role in ones success. Different people have distinct...
^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contribute'?
Suggestion: contribute
...ed to their education. Not only does it contributes to enjoying a better plan in terms of i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contribute'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: contribute
...ed to their education. Not only does it contributes to enjoying a better plan in terms of i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...id wasting time and use it efficiently.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, in regard to, in spite of, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02202643172 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79314956426 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550660792952 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1995145602 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.45110844103 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279349366568 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820583466385 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14119937819 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168644846769 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709486083808 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.