whether or not governments must take improving internet access more weighty than improving public transportation
In this modern life, it is crystal clear that governments are faced with a lot of expense in different realms, so they must prioritize all of their expenses and divide their budgets. One of the heated controversies all around the world is that whether or not governments must take improving internet access more weighty than improving public transportation. In this regard, individuals carry different opinions. I, personally, subscribe to the idea that nowadays, internet access is more important than public transportation; therefore, governments must consider the bigger budget for improving internet access. The internet is the primary need of a country as far as its flourishing is concerned. They can be up-to-the-minute and also settlements can do productive activities.
To begin with, as we know, in this modernized life, most of the people rely on the internet to their tasks. To clarifying, all students must do research throughout the internet, or many companies do most portions of their works on the internet. With this line of thought, accessibility to the high-speed internet is the prime demand of modern human beings. On the other hand, a society can flourish via the great efforts of the university students and skillful employees, for example, they can solve problems of the society with creating a new technology or equipment. Considering all of this, governments have not to take the importance of internet access lightly. They must provide all inhabits with good and reliable internet access. An example can shed light on this idea. I used to work in a big researching group in our country. We find new materials and achievement via the internet to solve the problem of three big companies. For a few months, we did not have high-speed internet, subsequently, we were not able to respond to companies’ requests immediately. After a while, all relevant organs met a lot of problems. In fact, it acts as a chain and impacted a lot of companies and people. We can understand how internet access and improving it is important.
Secondly, in this unpredictable world with a lot of occurrence around the world, all governments need to have a good attainability to the internet to keep themselves with the trend race of the world. I mean, nowadays, not only are there a lot of important news all around the world that we need to know; but also there are a lot of new inventions and technologies that need a great accessibility to the internet to apply them in our country. For instance, I remember that when I was a master degree student, we worked on a big project cooperating with a Chinese university. They sent us a piece of priceless laboratory equipment, unfortunately, since our country has not spent enough money to improve the internet access, we could not run that equipment. It was a big lost of the chance to continue such a beyond the price project and be in the same rate of progress with foreign countries.
In summary, with all this taken into account, I do believe that governments have to consider the bigger fund for improving the internet than improving public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...troversies all around the world is that whether or not governments must take improving interne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in fact, in summary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2615.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00957854406 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0670809191 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.535298708 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.88 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333303089786 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101846128795 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154371418096 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254142948893 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141308766257 0.0645574589148 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.