Which do you prefer: resolving a problem through emails and text messages or resolving it through phone calls and voice mails? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Nowadays, people have several ways to keep a connection with their friends through social media, email, cellphone and voice mails. As people use different tools to solve their problems, they have to choose the way wisely. Some people may state that resolving a problem through emails and text messages is an efficient way while others argue that phone calls and voice mails are deep to discuss the problem. In my opinion, I prefer using phone calls and voice mails to connect with people for several reasons.
First of all, resolving problems though phone calls and voice mails can directly save the problem without a waste of time. To illustrate, when I worked in the urban office in Taipei city which in Taiwan, we often to use emails and letters to discuss the design project without a mayor. Nevertheless, it is too hard to use the message to explain the beauty of the design and we cannot know the feedback immediately. We waste of our time and the mayor’s crowded schedule. To resolve this problem, we start using voice mails to communicate, if we have some emergency problems, we will call the major directly. As a result, it is an efficient way that helps us to catch the deadline for the assignment.
Second, through calling and voice mails, people can deeply discuss solution safety. To be specific, the president of Taiwan will not use email to connect with other countries because it is too easy to catch the details in the mail but it is impossible to hear the voice through the calling in the president office. Personally, I have several times of the crucial interviews with companies. The manager can deeply observe people’s faces and emotion to know the characteristics of the person. In contrast, if the manager only use words of the messages to understand the interviewer, it will take a risk that the person who wrote the mail is totally different with the truly worker who go to the company, due to people can ask someone to act like a polite person through writing. In the end, I recommend people who have to resolve problem by calling and voice mails because we have to extremely deliberate the solution with each other.
Third, as people talking, the tone and emotion through the voice help me to understand his or her feeling about the problem. For example, I have the thesis design with my professor who stays in Japan for several months. Actually, even we use voice mails and phone calls to communicate, we still have an effective process to keep the design in good condition. If he has a cough or sighs through the calling, I will know that maybe he is not satisfying of the project. Also, I will be anxiety if my talking is too fast and nervous. Eventually, voice is a true way to feel a person’s emotion and help us to organize the situation comprehensively.
Definitely, some people may think that it is embracing to solve the problem through talking like voice mails and phone calls because you only have one chance to talk about the topic and you cannot erase the texts like in the emails and messages. However, I suggest that people should practice much more through communication due to we talk a lot in every day and the process is necessary. Furthermore, resolving the problem through phone calls and voice mails not only cultivates our communication skills but increase our organize abilities as well. To conclude, I prefer to resolve the problem through phone calls and voice mails for the three reasons, and I gave the specific details about the topic why I prefer this way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iberate the solution with each other. Third, as people talking, the tone and e...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 434, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... the calling, I will know that maybe he is not satisfying of the project. Also, I will be anxiety...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 347, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...ough communication due to we talk a lot in every day and the process is necessary. Furthermo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, third, well, while, for example, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2938.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 614.0 407.700716846 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78501628664 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.977853291 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6028754248 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42671009772 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 910.8 618.680645161 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0727238768 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381904564156 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112058081887 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101609111565 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240881590328 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886573360854 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.