Which of the following resources is most effective for employers to know about applicants for a position 1 contact the applicant s former employer 2 check the applicant s online profile and social platform 3 provide internship for a month | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Which of the following resources is most effective for employers to know about applicants for a position?
1. contact the applicant's former employer
2. check the applicant's online profile and social platform
3. provide internship for a month

Some people believe that contacting the applicant's former employer is the most effective resource for employers to understand applicants. Others claim that checking the candidate's online profile is a better method. Still, others maintain that providing an internship for a month is more favorable. As far as I am concerned, the third option is the most ideal approach. My reasons are as follows.

To begin with, to effectively understand a candidate, employers must have a thorough understanding of an applicant's skill. And apparently, providing an internship for a month can help employers decide whether an applicant is suitable for the job effectively. For example, when I was applying for a job in an IT company called AIdea, my supervisor required me to participate in a twenty-days internship. My boss spent more than two weeks observing me solving an algorithm puzzle, managing some Linux operating systems, etc. Eventually, since these interviewers spoke to the candidates in person, they could fully understand who had adequate computer and programming knowledge and skills to deal with advanced coding problems. On the other hand, exaggerating one's skills on Facebook or Linkedin is exceptionally effortless; all they need to do is write a few lines of fake experience on their resume. So evidently, examining one's profile cannot help interviewers know thoroughly about a candidate's competence.

In addition, to effectively understand whether a job seeker is suitable for a position, employers must have a comprehensive understanding of that person's personality. And conspicuously, requiring people to join an internship for a few months can help employers achieve such a goal. Take AIdea again as an example. My boss required me to participate in a group programming project during the internship for 15 days. During that time, the interviewers could observe whether we irresponsibly push our missions to other teams, did we procrastinate, etc. Since the interviewers had the opportunity to keep an eye on the candidates directly, they could choose to hire responsible and diligent workers. Contrarily, former employers usually calumniate former employees out of revenge. Accordingly, asking former supervisors might make interviewers receive biased views about a candidate's characteristics.

In conclusion, I maintain that the third approach is the most effective way for interviewers to know about applicants for a position due to the aforementioned reasons.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'applicants'' or 'applicant's'?
Suggestion: applicants'; applicant's
...ust have a thorough understanding of an applicants skill. And apparently, providing an int...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ample, when I was applying for a job in an IT company called AIdea, my supervisor req...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
... when I was applying for a job in an IT company called AIdea, my supervisor required me...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 758, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...oblems. On the other hand, exaggerating ones skills on Facebook or Linkedin is excep...
^^^^
Line 3, column 986, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...lp interviewers know thoroughly about a candidates competence. In addition, to effectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e a comprehensive understanding of that persons personality. And conspicuously, requiri...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, so, still, third, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54617414248 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34501171742 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551451187335 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7172423525 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.095238095 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385638482459 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112421800762 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126061244215 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292992200543 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937551225708 0.0645574589148 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.