Which one do you think is the most useful to improve our environment? 1. Walking or bicycling to reduce driving 2. Only consuming organic food (reduce pesticide) 3. Reusing wastes
Serious environmental problems have long made people suffer, which largely undermines the quality of people’s lives. People have been searching for effective and useful methods to improve our environment. Some people are of the opinion that recycling wastes and merely eating organic food are of great use to promote the environment. From my point of view, of the above three approaches, reducing driving through walking or riding bicycles is the most effective way.
To begin with, only consuming organic food makes it difficult for people to continue for a long time. Without a doubt, eating organic food will drive the survive and thrive of organic farming, which is advantageous in many aspects, such as alleviating soil erosion and increasing soil fertility. However, adopting this way means that people have to completely abandon their former eating styles and begin to eat a vegetarian diet, and that makes it hard for people to hold on to the end, for they may feel tedious or even painful to eat such food every day. What is worse, this approach may probably threaten people’s health, because organic food cannot provide people with some necessary elements that non-organic food can supply. No one wants to improve the environment at the cost of their health. Thus, only eating organic food would be very likely to end up with failures.
Recycling wastes also seems to be a rather effective mean to protect the environment, and it is of great importance to limit the need for new natural resources and help sustain the environment for future generations. Normally, reusing wastes generally includes several steps including cleaning, sorting, which usually requires people to master relevant background knowledge and professional tools. In other words, if wastes, such as batteries and abandoned digital products, are incorrectly disposed of, they may not only be harmful to people but even worsen the current environment. Since not all the people acquire professional knowledge about treating wastes, thus they would rather place these wastes in their houses or just throw it away without any disposal. If this happens, how can we take recycling wastes as the most useful way?
At last, I would like to talk about the benefits of reducing driving. Since automobiles today emit a great amount of harmful gas like carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide into the air, reducing driving cars is beneficial to the environment by reducing air pollution. Also, this option is easy to follow up and set out. Here Beijing, a city with a large number of cars, is a good case on point. Beijing has long beset by heavy air contamination for many years. In order to improve the air condition, the government encourages citizens to ride bicycles or walk directly to their destinations. Since then, more and more people soon choose bicycles to go to work or go shopping, which is why sharing bicycles are ubiquitous in Beijing. As a result, the air condition has in Beijing improved to a large extent. In this case, walking or bicycling has proved to be the most useful path.
From what has been discussed above, it is easy to make the conclusion that walking or bicycling to reduce driving is the most useful way among the three ones to improve the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...merely eating organic food are of great use to promote the environment. From my poi...
^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...a doubt, eating organic food will drive the survive and thrive of organic farming, which is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 343, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... and set out. Here Beijing, a city with a large number of cars, is a good case on point. Beijing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2740.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06469500924 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65960969581 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526802218115 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 858.6 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.461305241 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.64 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3058477708 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830220623477 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062529610619 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181952530995 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054474370416 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.