It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to flourish and enhance their creativity to empower over facing a problem in the future. Whereas some people debate that working solitary gives you a great opportunity to contemplate creatively, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that working with each other in a research group is a better idea. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by underlying and persuasive reasons.
To commence with, it is no secret to anyone that one of the most obvious benefits of teamwork is that all members can freely share their ideas and opinions about a subject. As a matter of fact, every person has a point of view toward an issue, therefore, under such a circumstance, it is very simple for other members to improve their creativity by listening to others’ standpoints. Subsequently, those members will definitely guarantee against the problems related to that subject in the future. An example can shed some light on this subject. Several years ago when I took part in our university's research group, we encountered an electrical problem. Although I did not have any experience in that field of study because I am a mechanical engineer, I learned many concepts through the discussions made by the individuals in the group meetings. This really helped me get familiar with that field of study and improve my creativity when I confront a problem related to electrical issues.
Moreover, another advantage of participating in a research group is that you are able to get experience and increase your general knowledge. These two mentioned factors directly have a positive effect on the creativeness of an individual when he encounters a problem and will be obtained readily by making discussions in a research group. However, if a person wants to perform an unrelated task alone, he will distinctly need to spend much more time to gain that information and experience. In such a situation, that person cannot exert the experience and constructive comments of other members as well. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, due to the fact that I am not an electrical engineer, I gained much experience and learned much information about this field of study. I used the obtained knowledge when I encountered a problem in another project at the university. If I had worked alone on the first project, my inventiveness would have not been enhanced and also, I would have not been able to instruct the way to have a scientific view toward electrical subjects.
To wrap it up, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that better results can be obtained by working together instead of working alone. This is because all individuals can increase their general knowledge, gain experience, and improve their creativity. The noted parameters secure all persons against problems in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2645.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11605415861 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02980269406 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512572533849 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 849.6 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6400028519 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.227272727 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137137501229 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350119522458 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417479761125 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833274272306 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326786731055 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.