At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others? Why?
Generally, creativity plays an essential role in making us equipped with the best solutions in difficult situations. Hence, human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to find the most efficient way to flourish creativity. In this regard, some people believe that working in a group helps people be more productive, others believe working alone is better. I, personally, subscribe to the former one for a couple of reasons which I will discuss hereunder.
First and foremost, teamwork provides people various ideas. It is crystal clear that creativity has a direct connection with obtaining new ideas. In a team work more people are involved in the problem solving process. Hence, the members will achieve more potential solutions, since everybody has a particular way of thinking and looks at the problem from a different perspective. In addition, a group work provides an excellent opportunity for members to exchange ideas and complement each other to reach the best solution. Working alone, in contrary, does not include these merits.
Secondly, in a team work the level of stress decreases drastically, since the members support each other in order to achieve the best outcome. Relieving stress help the members enjoy the tension-free atmosphere, and work on the problem with more concentration. Furthermore, one can prevent probable unintentional mistakes when working with a group. The person who is working in solitude might decide based on wrong information, and confront serious consequences. On the other hand, working in a group provides the opportunity that members can correct each other.
In summary, with all this taken into account it can be concluded that working in a group help people enhance creativity, for not only it paves the way for getting familiar with diverse points of view, but also brings about a tranquil atmosphere which leads to a better concentration on the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26384364821 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85800874498 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57328990228 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6428389064 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135041886594 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476326902068 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269775217072 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856213696886 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287904144327 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.