Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Generally, communication has a pivotal role in our knowledge and conception of the world around us, and talking is one of the most essential means of it. The facts discussed in a conversation or a lecture might have different levels of reliability. Sometimes people may claim opinions that seem to be incorrect in our perspective. I personally believe that in a class or a meeting we should not interrupt the talk and wait until the class or meeting ends and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader for a couple of reasons which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, interrupting the lecturer in the middle of the lecture is not polite at all, since being quiet and listening to the lecturer is an act of respect in every culture. When we allow the lecturer to continue his or her words, we show them that we gratitude the time and energy that they are devoting to share their knowledge with us. In addition, there is a possibility that the lecturer will notice their mistake and correct it, since for many people talking among people may feel stressful and they may not be able to concentrate properly. Hence, waiting is a better option, because it provide them enough time.
Secondly, just because some thing seems incorrect to us does not mean that it is completely incorrect. There is a possibility that we are wrong. Hence, it is not worth to take other people's time by disruptingthe lecture. We can simply wait till the end, and discuss our idea with the lecturer at the end. In addition, some times the lecturer wants to explain some thing by stating an incorrect statement intentionally. For instance, I had a psychology professor in university that used to use this method. She used to begin a lecture by stating some wrong beliefs among people to draw our attention to the fact that they are not logically true, and they are just some misbeliefs. At the beginning we used to complain and interrupt her for her wrong statements, but after a while we learned that there is no need to do so, since she herself will explain why she has said so.
To sum up, in a conversation or lecture when the lecturer says something incorrect it is better to be quiet and wait till the end, since not only it is an indicator of our respect toward the speaker, but also it may be our mistake and lack of knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
... waiting is a better option, because it provide them enough time. Secondly, just bec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
... enough time. Secondly, just because some thing seems incorrect to us does not mean tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...ome times the lecturer wants to explain some thing by stating an incorrect statement inten...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61483253589 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66724525461 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480861244019 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.800833089 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.470588235 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5882352941 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149432123456 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443160250382 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739500759602 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102801652561 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757688496677 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.