Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Generally, universities have a leading role in the progress of societies in science and technology grounds. Hence, improving its performance is of great importance. University professors, as the main members of universities, have a critical profession. In this regard, some people believe that in order to improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Others believe that this budget should be spent in other aspects. I, personal, subscribe to the former one, due to a number of reasons, two of which are of great importance, which are elaborated upon hereunder.
First and foremost, university professors should not be involved in economic issues. It is crystal clear that university professors have compact schedules. They should make sure to update their knowledge day by day, since they have a vital role in discovering new method, ideas, hypotheses and so forth. Besides, they put a lot of effort to work in laboratories and classes preparing materials for lecture. Concerning this, they should not be worried about some trivial issues like their economic situations or how to make ends meet on their low salaries. In other words, they should enjoy job satisfaction in order to have incentive to continue their works. In addition, it prevents them from getting stressed out. Thus, they can work in a calm appropriate tension-free atmosphere and easily concentrate on their duties, which results in a dramatic progress of the educational system
Having discussed the issue form the previous perspective, I would rather look at it from another point of view. Having more salaries enables professors to invest in researching more. They can spend their salaries to equip laboratories and take more students and technicians to work and research. Hence, students can enjoy having access to various state-of-the-art facilities. Consequently, students will be more willing to pursue their studies or even may have a dream of becoming of the future professors. The increase in research will definitely lead to a thriving industry and development of the country in scientific, economical, political and social grounds.
In summary, considering all above mentioned arguments, it can be concluded that the best way to improve the quality of education in a society is to increase the salaries of university professors. In doing so, not only it brings about more job satisfaction, but also it paves the way to induce the research spirit and budget for the next breakthroughs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'dramatic progress'.
Suggestion: dramatic progress
...trate on their duties, which results in a dramatic progress of the educational system Having dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, may, so, thus, in addition, in summary, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33665835411 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04188908774 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5536159601 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3377549188 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.904761905 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201142465445 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065633207268 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834339767223 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136640689365 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711700575941 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.