There is no doubt that Job pleasure, which is affected by several factors, is an important criterion for the workforce in societies. However, establishing whether task variability, as one factor, contributes to satisfaction workers get from their careers or not is a controversial issue has yet to be resolved. In this context, one idea, worthing to mention, is that employees experience more content when they are given different responsibilities within a workday than those who are instructed to do recurring tasks. from my perspective, I believe it is a valid assumption and I will delve into reasons substantiating my standpoint in the following.
To start with, entrusting a worker to perform various range of duties rather than a repetitive task cultivates in him an internal feeling of being effective and invaluable. when an employee carries out different tasks, he feels that he is doing significant amount of job for his company and deems his performance benefits the whole enterprise. These thoughts further amplify as he maintains his job for years and thinks of himself as an important and valuable asset whose effects on the productivity of the company cannot be ignored. In such circumstances, his confidence also improves since he finds himself capable of conducting range of workaffairs without any problem, and a surge of satisfaction embodies him.
Another thing to mention is, due to the diverse nature of their job, workers who have various obligations to fulfill each day are less prone to fatigue and tediousness than single-tasking ones, thereby experiencing more pleasure in their career. Repeating similar tasks in the workplace every day kills enthusiasm and appeal of a job for an employee resulting in reluctancy to perform his duties. Consequently, as such a person becomes disinterested in his career, time passes irritatingly slow when causing him to be exhausted to death while he is at work. In this regard, I think my current job is a perfect example. I have worked for almost eight months in my present job. Until now, the working agenda has been constant and every day I am assigned to predefined sets of tasks such as; revising and editing technical documents to accomplish at the end of the day. the sheer boringness that I experience in the workplace stems from the recurring nature of my duties that is the main reason I genuinely hate my job.
To sum up, I believe the assumption stated in the question, which multi-task workers are more content with their job than single-task ones, is a valid statement. This is because workers assigned to various tasks more frequently feels being effective and productive, and because the varying nature of their job decreases the chance of work-related fatigues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 519, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...o are instructed to do recurring tasks. from my perspective, I believe it is a valid...
^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ling of being effective and invaluable. when an employee carries out different tasks...
^^^^
Line 5, column 868, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ts to accomplish at the end of the day. the sheer boringness that I experience in t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, while, another thing, i think, no doubt, such as, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13363028953 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03479719224 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559020044543 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8748108432 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.588235294 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4117647059 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197106212844 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604172907141 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551777193945 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125391469203 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331010601957 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.