There is no gainsaying that jobs have profound impacts in human beings and people always are concerning about choosing proper jobs. In this respect, there are controversial arguments whether a worker is more satisfied when do multi task during workday or do similar tasks all day long. From my perspective, people should do various tasks rather than similar tasks. The ensuing paragraphs will elaborate my points of view.
First exquisite point to be mentioned is that workers doing different tasks are capable to learn more things about their jobs and utilize this experience in during their lives. There is no doubt that job markets is a brutal competitive market and the great majority of workers lose their jobs in stagnation in economical stagnation especially workers who do not have enough experience and skills. In this respect, workers should be ready for doing various task in different situations. For instance, once I worked in stock broker and did various jobs and learn various tasks. One day, my boss was changed and new boss coerce me to quit the broker. I could easily quit my work and found a new job, of course I worked as a trade in first jobs but I could to find a new job as a financial analyst, since I had have enough experience for financial analyzing. Therefore, there is no doubt that worker who do various and different task are likely to find jobs more easily.
Second point comes to my mind is that worker who are responsible to do some similar and unchanged tasks, are not able to foster their creativity sense. To put in apposite words, when people thrive in creativities when they cope with new problems, while a person do the same task for days or even years do not confront with new problems. For example, a software engineering always is challenges by new bugs and virus, as a result, she always should ponder over new problem to solve them. Hence, this is undeniable that workers who do new and different tasks in working place have more opportunity for innovations.
Last but not least, there is no doubt that human beings enjoy variety and differetiat. In other words, human being are not able to do the same tasks for days and years like robots. The great majority of people have problem with this kind of jobs and they quit these jobs as soon as they can find new jobs. for example, watchmen have boring jobs, the most of them should be awake during night and there are few people that they can do this career for years until retiring.
In conclusion, contemplating all aforementioned paragraphs, workers who do various and different task are more satisfied than doing similar tasks. Since, they learn new things and become more creative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...pacts in human beings and people always are concerning about choosing proper jobs. In this res...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 808, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...job as a financial analyst, since I had have enough experience for financial analyzi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have more opportunity for innovations. Last but not least, there is no doubt th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...jobs as soon as they can find new jobs. for example, watchmen have boring jobs, the...
^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn new things and become more creative.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, of course, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78924731183 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49905427828 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445161290323 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7430376059 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.047619048 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342327180513 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122566822816 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118394263774 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245200288484 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832963255948 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.