Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
▲
As a human beings, we have to do various types of tasks in everyday work schedules. Tasks are assigned to us in our job. Personally, I believe, if a person has different kinds of jobs to do, he will be more pleased to do so. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, a person will learn more if he/she is accustomed to doing different kinds of works. To be more specific, diversity trains a person to face difficult and arduous tasks. A person gets used to facing a dilemma if he can prepare himself to do so. In everyday works, we have to do different kinds of jobs to shine in any specific field. In this competitive and dynamic world, everyone has the ability to learn various kinds of jobs. And if he does so, then it will be beneficial for him in the long run. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last year I was a car technician in a private technological company, I usually did the assembly of the car parts which were imported by the company from a foreign country. I only knew about how to make the assembly. I did not have any idea how to drive a car or how to change the fuel of a car or how to sell them to the customer. When it was time for selling the car or drive the car for engine check I was unable to do so. Had the company assigned me to those jobs, then I would have learned them and use them for broadening my knowledge related to the car industry.
Secondly, doing the same task over and over causes the employee to feel bore and monotone. The maximum industry or work station prefers to hire an employee for only one kind of task. But It is really mundane for them to do the same task because they may feel bad. And also, by doing so their work efficiency may also deteriorate. People prefer change because they love to take challenges. My cousin's experience is a compelling example of this. He was an employee of a multinational company, It is "was"
because he left the job recently. The company hired him for operating the computer and keeping track of the annual sales that the company has done. After 2 years he felt bore because there were no other tasks for him to do. Then suddenly he thought, his life was stuck to the computer and he found no other way to go. Afterward, he left the job and would join another company that has a varied policy regarding the dissemination of jobs. Had the company not assigned him the monotonous job, then he would not have left because of boredom.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that workers must be satisfied if different kinds of job have assigned to them. This is because they learn more by doing different jobs and they are satisfied because boredom is not affected their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'being'?
Suggestion: being
As a human beings, we have to do various types of tasks i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36328125 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50944261662 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453125 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2893973071 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.4666666667 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217351068709 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617867647508 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592818281278 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144030646114 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628827464342 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.71 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.