Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Every person in all over the world has their own interests and preferences; so, he acts according to them. For example, some people prefer to do many different types of tasks to do during the workday. However, others prefer to do similar tasks all day long. Each of them has its own pros and cons, but I contend that doing a different type of task during the workday is better. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint.
First, doing similar tasks during the day makes everyone exhausted. If they get tired, their efficacies and creativity will decrease. So, they can't think effectively and present a different solution for each problem. As a result, these companies will not be profitable. I remember I was labour in a company. I had to enlist the names and the serial numbers of our recently received goods in a notebook. I had to do it all day; so, it got me exhausted. One day, since I was tired at the end of the day, I made a mistake and I wrote the wrong serial numbers for some goods; consequently, my company send them to the wrong customers. Unfortunately, it hurt my resume and our reputation's company.
Second, if someone does different skills all day long, not only he will increase his efficiency, but also he will improve his various abilities. If they have to do several tasks, they should be in contact with several people so their social skills will improve and they will feel more confident. Also, when you do various tasks, you will find more of your talents that you are not familiar with them. And it causes you to have a multi-dimensional personality. In some cases, if you are not satisfied with your job, doing different tasks will provide you with many opportunities that can help you to find your favourite career.
To wrap it up, doing different tasks not only cause you to have good efficiencies at work but also cause you to have an open mind and also provide you with new and stunning opportunities to exploit them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
.... For example, some people prefer to do many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...and creativity will decrease. So, they cant think effectively and present a differe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... recently received goods in a notebook. I had to do it all day; so, it got me exh...
^
Line 6, column 588, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help you find' instead.
Suggestion: help you find
...de you with many opportunities that can help you to find your favourite career. To wrap it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tunning opportunities to exploit them.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, for example, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64857142857 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6539781461 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505714285714 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4839709797 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.35 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340745097355 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103260027193 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994976291246 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202126864278 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832302686578 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.