Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Over the past years, the issue of whether or not employers prefer to do a routine duty at works every day or doing multiple and different duties during days for becoming satisfied from jobs has received a great deal of attention from psychologists and employments. Although some may say that doing a routine duty increase yield and speed of doing a task by saving time; I, as well as many others, believe that a routing task is boring and it causes them tired, but different duties increase creativities and job satisfaction.
First of all, an important reason why a job with different duties is better than other option is that increase creativities of workers. By having different tasks, employees would not follow some specific and constant roles for doing their tasks. In any case, they must find specific solutions for them so that their creativities would increase. Furthermore, every day individuals face new challenges at works, and they had to solve them. I believe that this kind of jobs cannot bore their workers; hence, they have enthusiastic about finding and doing tasks in the best ways and increasing the yield of working.
Another reason for this point of view is that the abilities of workers are increased by doing different activities. When labourers forced to do multiple tasks, they had to improve their skills and capabilities until they become a success in their jobs. Hence, they try to learn many skills related to their tasks. Consider a computer engineer, for instance. If he or she does not know some soft-wards application, they would fail at work. In this situation, he or she tries to learn many programs such as Matlab, Auto-Cad, Hysis and many other items so that he or she not only will become a flourishing person at works but also will increase proficiency.
On the other hand, it is occasionally said that jobs in which workers have to do the same tasks are better because these types of jobs are very easy and workers do not have any difficulties to deal with. In this situation, ones do their duties with the least amount of mistakes so that the yield of works would be increased. Furthermore, by doing routine activities, workers follow simple roles; hence, they may not become tired or disappointed with their jobs. In other words, job satisfaction will be increase.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that workers become more satisfied and happier when they do a job with different tasks than doing a simple and routine job chiefly due to better chances for development in these jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Over the past years, the issue of whether or not employers prefer to do a routine duty a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 139, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...erent activities. When labourers forced to do multiple tasks, they had to improve the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, in any case, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92938496583 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67404429986 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480637813212 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6715114641 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363482983152 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111370997182 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781815358301 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221383687106 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448747695924 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.