Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer.
Throughout history, the friend has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to it is paramount importance, researchers have always searched for ways to improve relationships between people. A controversial question which is often raised this idea is whether people can readily effect to each other when they become friends or not. I personally contend that friends have the right effect on each other in all situation; therefore, I agree with this proposal. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite factor to be mentioned is that people spend the most time with their friends; hence, they can easily effect to each other. To elaborate on my point, since individuals consume many times with people who have a strong bond with them, they try to balance their behaviour for improving the relationship. Based on a famous hypothesis, the people who deplete many times with you, they will make your future characters. character This group has members, and 4 of these people have a high degree in the university. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, a 5th person tries to change and start to get a high grade from the university as the same as other friends. Thus, friends can easily affect each other.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that people find someone who has the same behaviour and mentally as their friends. To shed more light on this matter, inasmuch as friends have same character, they can readily influence on each other. As we know, we see this hypothesis, especially among teenagers. They try to wear the same cloth; furthermore, they copy behaviour from their friends. Dr Maryam Ferdosi, A teenager psychologist who is working at Dey Children Center (DCC)," you can analysis character of your kids by finding their close friends". She also added that most teenagers' behaviour can stem from their friends who spend many times with them.
To swap it up, all the aforementioned lead us to the conclusion that individuals copy behaviour from their friend; therefore, the friends can easily effect on the people. I believe that not only friend spend many times with each other but also friends have many same characters; hence, they can readily effect on each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., they can easily effect to each other. To elaborate on my point, since individu...
^^
Line 4, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Character
... they will make your future characters. character This group has members, and 4 of these...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l make your future characters. character This group has members, and 4 of these p...
^^
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ho is working at Dey Children Center DCC,' you can analysis character of your kid...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 599, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...friends'. She also added that most teenagers behaviour can stem from their friends w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0585106383 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67465934758 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6924781139 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.105263158 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144510944681 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526499171319 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346511525265 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101490295596 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189149538782 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.