Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In modern times, people especially working adults have an increasing types of jobs to choose when they step into society. Although some may say doing a variety of tasks during the workday has more benefits, others would argue that it is better to perform similar tasks all day long. As I see it, I will support the former, because doing different types of work can avoid boredom, help us learn more skills and also find out our real interests.
To begin with, dealing with various kinds of tasks during workday can avoid repetition and boredom. Chasing new things and ideas is a form of human nature. Doing these tasks means their brain can switch from things to things, thus stimulating the part of their brain and keeping it operating. This can encourage passion about what they are doing. Passion and a sense of freshness is very important for people to maintain a mental balance on work. That is to say, they are more likely to have a great working passion, which would lead them to career success. Take my friend Tom as an example. He has a job as a reporter in the national broadcast. He has to take on a variety of duties such as interview, writing reports and editing. It seems very challenging for others, but in his words this job is amazingly interesting. He never feels bored during the workday and there is even another benefit: he can have a rest and recovery on rest days. Overall, doing many things during the workday is a great stimulator.
Doing types of tasks during workday can also help us to learn more skills. When people are dealing with these tasks, they have to keep learning and practicing different areas of knowledge and skills. If they just do things repeatedly, they tend to dwell on their comfortable zone and fall lazy and upset. By doing many things at the same time, they can become well-rounded and knowledgeable individuals
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, as to, such as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69207317073 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41108810513 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567073170732 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6626800037 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347793377619 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936172119857 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836885097253 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266967661083 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823744589736 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.