Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
While workers in a company are usually assigned to specific works during a period, they still can arrange their time in a day. Some people prefer to be satisfied when they can do many different types of tasks during a day while others prefer to pick up only one kind of tasks to do. Personally, I consider that workers are more satisfied when they can do various types of works during the day since it is supposed to make the workday more efficient and interesting.
Firstly, it is known that our brains have different parts controlling different kinds of actions of our bodies and different types of works use different sections of our brain. Our brains are so easy to be tired that continueing use certain parts of our brains is going to decrease our efficiency very quickly. On the contrary, if we can switch between diverse works after a period of time, the certain part of our brains can be relaxed so that it will be recharged can full of power when we switch back, generating the higher efficiency. I prefer to change my attention to another work when I am stuck in a problem for a long time since better solutions and some aspects haven't been considered before often occurs in my mind after doing that, telling me that sticking on a same work is not a sensible decision.
Secondly, there is no doubt that taking up different types of tasks is going to make your workday more interesting. To begin with, you can browse informations from different topics and practice different working skills. For instance, when required to solve a problem related to a software, you can practice your programming skills; when assigned to investigate the customers' demand, inter-communication abilities can be cultivated. Different works having different interesting points which will avoid you from being bored with a single task. Moreover, when you conduct different types of work, you can get in touch with different types of people. Exchanging opinions and views with diverse people is also an interesting and valuable experience.
To conclude, I believe that having many different types of tasks to do satisfy workers more than just having similar tasks all day long.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...prefer to be satisfied when they can do many different types of tasks during a day while other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...an switch between diverse works after a period of time, the certain part of our brains can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...since better solutions and some aspects havent been considered before often occurs in ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
.... To conclude, I believe that having many different types of tasks to do satisfy workers mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, kind of, no doubt, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88617886179 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69300889587 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509485094851 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5536178188 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.785714286 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425694692244 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165692381887 0.076458572812 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171232959113 0.0737576698707 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341487950804 0.150856017488 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210223821117 0.0645574589148 326% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.