Go to Mars
Whether we can send humans to Mars in the future is the focus of both the professor and the writer. Three problems, including the long time of the round-trip, the zero gravity environment ,and the dangerous radiation, have been elaborated. However, the professor states that scientists have found solutions to those problems. I will explain it in detail in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, the professor asserts that those needed resources can be obtained by astronauts themselves. Therefore, they can live through the time when they fly to Mars. He explores the detailed reasons by introducing a technology called hydroponics at first. Hydroponics can be used to grow vegetables within a small area, which enables astronauts to have sufficient food. Moreover, grown plants can recycle wastes and produce water and oxygen which is essential for humans. As a result, astronauts can adopt this technology to live on the way to Mars.
Secondly, the professor argues that today's astronauts have been accustomed to the zero-gravity environment so it is not a problem to live under such conditions. He advances his theory by pointing out that there have been many astronauts living in the space station which also has a zero-gravity environment. Those astronauts have found ways, like exercising, to prevent their bodies from losing functions. So, it isn't impossible for astronauts to live in a zero-gravity environment without health problems.
Thirdly, the professor stresses that dangerous solar radiation only happens occasionally so that astronauts on the mission won't be exposed to the solar radiation for a long time. He supports his idea by examining the fact that solar radiation is only produced when the sun becomes active periodically. Thus, astronauts are not usually exposed to a dangerous environment if they are on a mission on Mars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...round-trip, the zero gravity environment ,and the dangerous radiation, have been e...
^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ir bodies from losing functions. So, it isnt impossible for astronauts to live in a ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33105802048 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98545281557 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556313993174 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0491620628 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8823529412 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0179767194059 0.272083759551 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00748582276528 0.0996497079465 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299432910611 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0151215593571 0.162205337803 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261913090961 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.