Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning, but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning would be better for students.
Schools usually implement various methods to help students be engaged in studying including requiring students to attend school at a fixed time. It is the time that often arises a heated discussion. Some people believe that attending school early benefits students’ study a lot while others contend that starting the school day at a later time in the morning is better for students. From my perspective, I am in favor of the late opinion and I will delve into explaining my reasons in the following passage.
Firstly, allowing students to attend school later in the morning helps students have enough sleep which is important for both teenagers and adults. It is known that good sleep can benefit our brains as well as our bodies. According to a series of documentaries of BBC, good and enough sleep contributes to the construction of long-term memories in our brain by connecting separated short-term memory points. Besides, unhealthy chemical compositions can be removed so that we usually feel clear after sleeping. Both processes mentioned above take time. In the opposite, people lacking sleep time often start a next day’s work with a unrest brain and tied body which do harms to their health from a long-term view. Therefore, leaving enough time for students to sleep plays a crucial role in supporting students’ study.
Secondly, starting the school day later is more friendly to the human’s biological clock from my experience. You are not supposed to start studying too early even though you get up early, which is what I summarize according to my own experience. In detail, many parts of your body, like your eyes, may haven’t prepared well for a whole day’ work even though your brains have awakened. I get up naturally at 6:00 every morning without setting up a clock. In the beginning, the study was the first thing I would do after washing my face. However, a feeling of tiredness occurred to my eyes after staring at the screen for an hour which prevented me from continuing studying. After observing this phenomenon, I began to play sports, like riding a bike, after waking, delaying my study, which actually powered up it: my eyes didn’t get acid quickly and my brain was more clear than that was before. So, I have conformed to this schedule till now, start studying later in the morning and playing sports before it.
To conclude, I believe that starting the school day later in the morning benefits students more than starting it early.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...time often start a next day’s work with a unrest brain and tied body which do har...
^
Line 5, column 764, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ports, like riding a bike, after waking, delaying my study, which actually powere...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95443645084 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6071238364 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541966426859 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3282472637 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374374875845 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114932341894 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149340111175 0.0737576698707 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291014969878 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139579109413 0.0645574589148 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.