Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
It is generally believed that people need a little variety in their work to create a suitable condition. The most persuasive point is that to do some uniform tasks by workers cause feel boring in during their day. Nevertheless, to do many different types of tasks are much more pleasant for them. There are numerous reasons why workers would like to some different tasks in their workplace, and I would explore only a few primary ones here.
In the beginning, the first aspect to point out that the variety of activity is one of the important reasons for changing the mood of people. Moreover, all workers need to do some duties that make them feel great. For example, I remembered when I worked for a big company as a manager where I had to do many uniform tasks and hardly had I did some different tasks; however, I liked my job. Besides, my colleague suggested changing my duties in during a day. In practically, he told me that I could go to inside the company to work beside other workers, by this way, not only I could check the condition of work's environment, but also I could manage how my workers did their tasks. Finally, I was satisfied with my activity in during the day; nevertheless, I could control the condition of my company.
Second, I would like mention another benefit of doing no similar tasks by workers. I think that this issue helps them to increase their motivation. Given this issue, if managers dedicated different tasks to their workers, they would cause to become better the approach of their workers. For instance, my friend always could not concentrate on her work owing to the condition of office, so she asked of her manager to change her activity in the office. After that, what they had guessed about the approach of office was so amazing because of increasing amount of activity them in during a workday. Hence, this matter pokes the path for satisfying employments.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely reach the conclusion that the kind of tasks that to do by workers how can help them to their approaches; therefore, there are some merits that regarding for this matter such as improving the activity of workers and increasing the amount of pleasant workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...n during their day. Nevertheless, to do many different types of tasks are much more pleasant f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explore only a few primary ones here. In the beginning, the first aspect to po...
^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becoming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: becoming
...asks to their workers, they would cause to become better the approach of their workers. F...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7293814433 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55783744905 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2900904103 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.941176471 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269501183089 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904222693109 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804165983544 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164342445292 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055557172184 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.