Workers are more stisfied when they have alot of different tasks to do compared to workers have similar tasks.
Career choice is one of the most important factors in the quality of our lives. In this regard, many prefer to choose a career in which they are given a wide variety of tasks to do since they will not get bored, others, however, disagree. I personally subscribe to the view that it would be incredibly beneficial if workers engage in similar activities at work. I cling to this standpoint for two main reasons, which I will elucidate in the following essay.
To begin with, doing similar tasks every day will undoubtedly lead the whole business to be more productive. To be more specific, when workers do the same tasks every day they will be more professional and specialist in their own field of profession. This, in turn, cause every piece of tasks to be accomplished by a specialist, not by the worker who has only a superficial understanding of the issue. Hence, as every and each task has been accomplished in the best way, the whole members will benefit. An experience of my own is a compelling example of this. For about 5 years I had been working in a consulting engineering which contributed to road and bridge construction. After 5 years working in that company, I could not consider myself a bridge designer because I had to work on a wide variety of projects including hydraulic design of channels, piers of bridge, culverts, to name but a handful. Although I grasped a general knowledge in each and every field when I decided to change my job I was not qualified for any of them due to lack of professional experience. Had I engaged in just bridge designing, I would have mastered in the area and guaranteed my future career.
Second, if workers do similar tasks every day, it is less likely to undergo a massive financial burden due to delay. Some businesses are charged a high fine because they do not finish the project before due time. When people are engaged in some works every day, they will become master in their field, and they then will be better able to finish their obligations on time with least errors. Hence, both the company and workers benefit from this policy.
To put all in a nutshell, considering all the aforementioned points and examples, I firmly believe that it would be more beneficial for both company and workers if the workers engage in similar tasks every day. I feel so because not only does it help workers to be specialist in their tasks, but it also is more economical due to performing the projects on time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Career choice is one of the most importa...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will elucidate in the following essay. To begin with, doing similar tasks every...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 927, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'general knowledge'.
Suggestion: general knowledge
... name but a handful. Although I grasped a general knowledge in each and every field when I decided ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...area and guaranteed my future career. Second, if workers do similar tasks ever...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...ble to finish their obligations on time with least errors. Hence, both the company and wor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and workers benefit from this policy. To put all in a nutshell, considering al...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, so, then, i feel, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64449541284 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71148938605 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504587155963 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2147844328 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.578947368 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9473684211 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265770551676 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799109860004 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067481260588 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172115975331 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343465798508 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.